Polynomial Representations of GL_n(English, Paperback, Green James A.)

Polynomial Representations of GL_n(English, Paperback, Green James A.)

  • Green James A.
Publisher:Springer Science & Business MediaISBN 13: 9783540469445ISBN 10: 3540469443

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart ₹ 2850SnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book Agency₹3329Books Wagon₹335Book ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

Polynomial Representations of GL_n(English, Paperback, Green James A.) is written by Green James A. and published by Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 3540469443 (ISBN 10) and 9783540469445 (ISBN 13).

This second edition of "Polynomial representations of GL (K)" consists of n two parts. The ?rst part is a corrected version of the original text, formatted A in LT X, and retaining the original numbering of sections, equations, etc. E The second is an Appendix, which is largely independent of the ?rst part, but whichleadstoanalgebraL(n,r),de?nedbyP.Littelmann,whichisanalogous to the Schur algebra S(n,r). It is hoped that, in the future, there will be a structure theory of L(n,r) rather like that which underlies the construction of Kac-Moody Lie algebras. We use two operators which act on "words". The ?rst of these is due to C. Schensted (1961). The second is due to Littelmann, and goes back to a1938paperbyG.deB.Robinsonontherepresentationsofa?nitesymmetric group.Littelmann'soperatorsformthebasisofhiselegantandpowerful"path model" of the representation theory of classical groups. In our Appendix we use Littelmann's theory only in its simplest case, i.e. for GL . n Essential to my plan was to establish two basic facts connecting the op- ations of Schensted and Littelmann. To these "facts", or rather conjectures, I gave the names Theorem A and Proposition B. Many examples suggested that these conjectures are true, and not particularly deep. But I could not prove either of them.