Ethnography in the Open Science and Digital Age: New Debates, Dilemmas, and Issues

Ethnography in the Open Science and Digital Age: New Debates, Dilemmas, and Issues

  • Colin Jerolmack
  • Alexandra Murphy
  • Victoria Reyes
Publisher:Frontiers Media SAISBN 13: 9782832546802ISBN 10: 2832546803

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart GOSnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book AgencyGOBooks WagonGOBook ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

Ethnography in the Open Science and Digital Age: New Debates, Dilemmas, and Issues is written by Colin Jerolmack and published by Frontiers Media SA. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 2832546803 (ISBN 10) and 9782832546802 (ISBN 13).

In the current moment, ethnography is caught up in a number of debates that have led ethnographers to reflect on classic methodological and ethical dilemmas in new ways. The “replication crisis” had led to a movement for “open science” (e.g., registering hypotheses in advance; sharing codes and data), but it seems unclear that recommended best practices are appropriate to ethnography. It’s even up for debate whether ethnography is more of a social science or a genre. The fact that many ethnographies are widely read invites questions and criticisms from beyond the ivory tower–including our subjects–about the ethics of representation (e.g., who has license to write about whom) and the extent to which journalistic standards of data verification and transparency (e.g., fact checking, naming sources) should apply to qualitative research. Some ethnographers are calling for more open, critical discussions about the embodied dimensions of fieldwork, including not only emotions but also issues like sexual intimacy and harassment. There’s also a growing expectation that ethnographers empower our subjects to represent and analyze themselves. What’s more, as more of social life is lived online, it becomes increasingly unclear where the boundaries of the “field site” should be drawn and whether ethnographic conventions can be applied wholesale to the study of digital spaces.