Between 'Race' and Culture(English, Paperback, Cheyette Bryan)

Between 'Race' and Culture(English, Paperback, Cheyette Bryan)

  • Cheyette Bryan
Publisher:Stanford University PressISBN 13: 9780804728539ISBN 10: 0804728534

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart ₹ 1726SnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book AgencyGOBooks Wagon₹250Book ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

Between 'Race' and Culture(English, Paperback, Cheyette Bryan) is written by Cheyette Bryan and published by Stanford University Press. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 0804728534 (ISBN 10) and 9780804728539 (ISBN 13).

This collection of essays examines various representations of "the Jew" in British and American literature in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It analyzes in detail the literary racism and antisemitism of some of the most important and influential writers of this period, including Dickens, Trollope, James, Eliot, Pound, Joyce, Woolf, and Orwell, as well as such marginal figures as Dorothy Richardson, Stevie Smith, and Michael Gold. The contributors are all well-known Anglo-American literary, cultural, or feminist critics; some have written extensively on literary racism or antisemitism, others are working in this area for the first time. The collection does not impose a schema or new orthodoxy, but instead encourages a plurality of approaches to a difficult and always contentious issue that has been demarcated into broadly defined "politically correct" and "liberal humanist" positions. Liberal humanism asserts that the ameliorating western canon has, by definition, nothing to do with racism or antisemitism. Political correctness wishes to exclude from the academy any literary text deemed to reinforce oppressive stereotypes. This volume adopts neither position, arguing instead that these two supposedly antagonistic approaches are, in fact, mirror-images of each other.