Jacques Ranciere(English, Paperback, Davis Oliver)

Jacques Ranciere(English, Paperback, Davis Oliver)

  • Davis Oliver
Publisher:PolityISBN 13: 9780745646558ISBN 10: 0745646557

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart ₹ 3550SnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book AgencyGOBooks Wagon₹777Book ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

Jacques Ranciere(English, Paperback, Davis Oliver) is written by Davis Oliver and published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 0745646557 (ISBN 10) and 9780745646558 (ISBN 13).

This book is a critical introduction to contemporary French philosopher Jacques Ranciere. It is the first introduction in any language to cover all of his major work and offers an accessible presentation and searching evaluation of his significant contributions to the fields of politics, pedagogy, history, literature, film theory and aesthetics. This book traces the emergence of Ranciere's thought over the last forty-five years and situates it in the diverse intellectual contexts in which it intervenes. Beginning with his egalitarian critique of his former teacher Louis Althusser, the book tracks the subsequent elaboration of Ranciere's highly original conception of equality. This approach reveals that a grasp of his early archival and historiographical work is vital for a full understanding both of his later politics and his ongoing investigation of art and aesthetics. Along the way, this book explains and analyses key terms in Ranciere's very distinctive philosophical lexicon, including the 'police' order, 'disagreement', 'political subjectivation', 'literarity', the 'part which has no part', the 'regimes of art' and 'the distribution of the sensory'. This book argues that Ranciere's work sets a new standard in contestatory critique and concludes by reflecting on the philosophical and policy implications of his singular project.