Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism(English, Hardcover, Den Otter Ronald C.)

Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism(English, Hardcover, Den Otter Ronald C.)

  • Den Otter Ronald C.
Publisher:Cambridge University PressISBN 13: 9780521762045ISBN 10: 0521762049

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart ₹ 14163SnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book AgencyGOBooks Wagon₹174Book ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism(English, Hardcover, Den Otter Ronald C.) is written by Den Otter Ronald C. and published by Cambridge University Press. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 0521762049 (ISBN 10) and 9780521762045 (ISBN 13).

Americans cannot live with judicial review, but they cannot live without it. There is something characteristically American about turning the most divisive political questions - like freedom of religion, same-sex marriage, affirmative action and abortion - into legal questions with the hope that courts can answer them. In Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism Ronald C. Den Otter addresses how judicial review can be improved to strike the appropriate balance between legislative and judicial power under conditions of moral pluralism. His defense of judicial review is predicated on the imperative of ensuring that the reasons that the state offers on behalf of its most important laws are consistent with the freedom and equality of all persons. Den Otter ties this defense to a theory of constitutional adjudication based on John Rawls's idea of public reason and argues that a law that is not sufficiently publicly justified is unconstitutional, thus addressing when courts should invalidate laws and when they should uphold them even in the midst of reasonable disagreement about the correct outcome in particular constitutional controversies.