The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature(English, Paperback, Simpson David)

The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature(English, Paperback, Simpson David)

  • Simpson David
Publisher:University of Chicago PressISBN 13: 9780226759500ISBN 10: 0226759504

Paperback & Hardcover deals ―

Amazon IndiaGOFlipkart ₹ 2236SnapdealGOSapnaOnlineGOJain Book AgencyGOBooks Wagon₹785Book ChorGOCrosswordGODC BooksGO

e-book & Audiobook deals ―

Amazon India GOGoogle Play Books GOAudible GO

* Price may vary from time to time.

* GO = We're not able to fetch the price (please check manually visiting the website).

Know about the book -

The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature(English, Paperback, Simpson David) is written by Simpson David and published by The University of Chicago Press. It's available with International Standard Book Number or ISBN identification 0226759504 (ISBN 10) and 9780226759500 (ISBN 13).

This critique of the postmodern turn discusses the distinctive aspects of postmodern scholarship: the pervasiveness of the literary and the flight from grand theory to local knowledge. Simpson examines defining features of postmodern thought - storytelling, autobiography, anecdote and localism - and traces their unacknowledged roots in literature and literary criticism. Considering such examples as the conversational turn in philosophy led by Richard Rorty and the anecdotal qualities of the New Historicism, he argues that much of contemporary scholarship is literary in its terms, methods, and assumptions about knowledge; in their often unconscious adoption of literary approaches, scholars have a limited way of looking at the world. He warns scholars against mistaking the migration of ideas from one discipline to another for a radically new response to the postmodern age. In his assessment of the academic postmodern enterprise, Simpson recognizes that both the literary turn and the emphasis on local, subjective voices have done much to enrich knowledge.But he also identifies the danger in abandoning synthetic knowledge to particular truths, cautioning that "we would be foolish to pretend that little narratives are true alternatives to grand ones, rather than chips off a larger block whose shape we can no longer see because we are not looking."